Board logo

标题: 关于星座,星座头和星座尾的理解 [打印本页]

作者: leizi1971    时间: 2013-01-17 19:17     标题: 关于星座,星座头和星座尾的理解

我们都知道,地球自转和公转运动的结合产生了地球上的昼夜交替、四季变化和五带的区分。而地球在环绕太阳公转的时候,也有近日点和远日的区别。在天文学中,四季分别以春分、夏至、秋分、冬至开始。
我的问题是,星座(黄道星座)实际上是因为地球公转的原因,带来的地球和太阳的相对位置不同,或者说是空间和角度的不同。比如就是因为春分的时候,地球和太阳的角度,地球相对太阳的位置,所以产生的一种作用力,那么我们说地球在运转到春分的位置的时候是“白羊”式的。这个时候天体系统给地球上的影响力是极富活力的,是“热”和“动”的。

第一,上面的理论是不是对的。
第二个问题,如果这个理论是对的,星座是和空间,相对位置有关,因为地球公转是持续的,那么行星落在星座头和星座尾是不是就会有区别了呢?引申一步,那么出生在两个星座交替时间的人,是不是同时受两个星座的影响呢?
[ 本帖最后由 leizi1971 于 2013-01-17  19:38 编辑 ]
作者: Felicia    时间: 2013-01-18 21:42     标题: 回复 1 # 的帖子

这是大卫老师对你第一个问题的回复:If the signs are not constellations then how can they have any forces or influence? (因为其实不大了解你第一个问题在问什么,所以就简单理解为上述问题了)

The signs have NO forces at all.  The signs are a "measurement" of the Earth's relationship with the Sun.  Whatever combination of energy or so called "forces" stem from the Earth's relationship with the Sun.  Understand this, 96% of our Solar Systems mass comes from the Sun!  So we are talking about how the earth's relationship with the Sun effects human behavior and human nature.

One must take into account the various features of Earth's orbit around the Sun, that are "repeated" each year, to grasp how these yearly variations play a role in the "dynamic effect" of the Zodiac.  However, it is my contention that science does not yet understand the full effect of solar energy in this context.  I admidt it is an over simplification to say that the physical cause lies in the Earth's response to Solar force or Solar energy as it orbits the Sun, but this is the obvious basis of any "physical cause" regarding the effect on human nature and human behavior, and this is what the zodiac measures.

Our solar system is an organizing system for life.
作者: Felicia    时间: 2013-01-18 21:53     标题: 回复 1 # 的帖子

大卫老师对你第二个问题的回复:

There are branches of western astrology that asign a "meaning" to each degree of the 360 degrees of the zodiac, such as "sabian symbols."  Such degree symbolism is "highly speculative" and I have seen only a few cases that suggest there might be something valid about this.  There is no doubt that the 12 fold division of the earth's orbit around the Sun has variations within each sign.  For example, there is the division of each sign into sections of 10 degrees called decanates.  Earch decan has a specific meaning different from the others, etc.  However, I must say that in "practice" I have not found these disctinctions significant or obvious at all.  You may be correct in assuming that the begining of a sign is different that the end of a sign, I think that in terms of cycles there is some truth in this!  However, the meaning of this appears to be not a high priority in practice.  I would say the importance of this variation is not a high priority.

I have seen the late degrees of each sign as more "full" or "expressive" of the signs nature, as if representing a fuller or more mature expression of the sign, but again there are other factors in a chart of much greater priority than this.
作者: Cora    时间: 2013-01-20 21:38     标题:

呦,有论坛啦,来踩踩!  
作者: leizi1971    时间: 2013-01-21 00:52     标题:

感谢大卫老师的解答!我还有好多问题,整理下继续啊~  
作者: RRRenee    时间: 2013-01-21 20:08     标题:

。。。有没有翻译
作者: 妖力空间    时间: 2013-09-18 20:06     标题:

能有人给翻译一下吗。。。。




欢迎光临 若道社区 (http://10.161.213.82:18080/) Powered by JspRun! 6.0.0